![Conclusion: The ABCs of Behavioral Biases](https://impactadvisorsgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Conclusion-The-ABCs-of-Behavioral-Biases-300x200.jpg.webp)
Conclusion: The ABCs of Behavioral Biases
During this series, we have learned that our own behavioral biases are often the greatest threat to our financial well-being.
Can artificial intelligence help pick stocks? More specifically, can investors use AI to determine the fair price of a stock or a bond? I bet a lot of people right now would say yes, given recent advances that allow for the processing of ever greater amounts of information.
I think my AI is better than all the other ones out there. My AI is the market.
For example, pick a stock. Check the price. Why is it that exact price? Because an equal number of buyers and sellers think they are getting a good deal when they sell or buy it at exactly that time. They make those judgments using every piece of information available to them, both public and private. The market is the world’s largest information processing machine, which creates a price for every publicly traded stock and bond.
These prices are set in an environment where no one knows what is going to happen. So, in that sense, it is a giant model that is humanity’s best and constantly evolving guess of how each company stock or bond will perform.
Despite all the promise of AI, I prefer to accept market prices rather than prices from algorithms. Large language models, the types of AI that power tools such as ChatGPT, are intended to understand and generate text that seems as if it was made by humans, not predict future outcomes.
They can generate potential scenarios based on learnt patterns, but they struggle to account for unknown factors or real-world changes that come outside their training data. In that way, they are truly “artificial,” while markets are composed of real, human intelligence and the millions of judgments market participants make.
Sure, AI and algorithmic trading can help the execution of trades. But there is no reason to think that AI should fundamentally influence the way people think about stock prices anytime soon.
The market is fantastically complex. So much so that no one knows exactly how much a particular piece of information impacts a price, because there are so many other simultaneous inputs. But the market ensures that a price is the most accurate current representation of the value of a stock or bond. It is free and available to all. How great is that?
This is not just my opinion. There is plenty of evidence to support it. In fact, it is a 50-year-old theory that only gets more proven with each passing year. Google “efficient market hypothesis.” Better yet, ask ChatGPT to explain it.
Still don’t believe me? Then let me ask another question: Do you think you can hire a manager to implement the strategy of using AI to pick stocks that consistently beat the market? After fees, probably not. If they had some cool AI that actually did predict stock prices better than the market, why would they share the information with you?
What is the takeaway? You can have a good experience without worrying about all that stuff. Based on nearly a century’s worth of data, the stock market has returned about 10% a year, which is 7% above inflation. (1) That was true before and after computers, before and after the internet, and even before and after the second World War. It makes sense to me that it will continue to be the case after AI. Because our AI is “aggregate intelligence,” which includes artificial intelligence and betters it.
To be clear, I celebrate the innovation that this moment may represent. As I have witnessed over and over during the past 50 years of my career, many players will try to take advantage of the newest advance in technology to improve their company and also to build new ones. By buying the market, you can have a piece of all the publicly traded companies.
And if I still have not convinced you, I asked ChatGPT, “Is it safer to trust the market price mechanism than rely on an AI model to find mispricing in stocks and bonds?”
Here is what I got back the day I asked:
“It is generally safer to trust the market price mechanism than to rely on an AI model to find mispricings in stocks and bonds. The market price mechanism is based on the collective actions of all market participants and incorporates all available information into asset prices. As a result, it is difficult for any single investor or AI model to consistently outperform the market by identifying mispricings.”
So, if you do not trust me, trust the AI that is telling you not to trust the AI over the market.
FREE FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT
With all the uncertainty and volatility in today’s economy, the time is now to take a thorough look at your finances. To accurately plan for your financial future, you must first know where you currently stand. For these reasons, our Success Team at Impact Advisors Group is offering a free financial assessment for both individuals and business owners. Request yours today!
This piece originally appeared in The Financial Times.
This post was written by David Booth (Executive Chairman and Founder of Dimensional Fund Advisors). This article was also first distributed by Dimensional Fund Advisors. Impact Advisors Group adheres to a similar investing philosophy to the one that is implemented by Dimensional Fund Advisors, which is the reasoning for the reposting of this article.
FOOTNOTES
(1) In US dollars. S&P 500 Index annual returns 1926–2021. S&P data © 2023 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global. All rights reserved. Indices are not available for direct investment; therefore, their performance does not reflect the expenses associated with the management of an actual portfolio.
DISCLOSURES
The information in this material is intended for the recipient’s background information and use only. It is provided in good faith and without any warranty or representation as to accuracy or completeness. Information and opinions presented in this material have been obtained or derived from sources believed by Dimensional to be reliable, and Dimensional has reasonable grounds to believe that all factual information herein is true as at the date of this material. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer of any services or products for sale and is not intended to provide a sufficient basis on which to make an investment decision. Before acting on any information in this document, you should consider whether it is appropriate for your particular circumstances and, if appropriate, seek professional advice. It is the responsibility of any persons wishing to make a purchase to inform themselves of and observe all applicable laws and regulations. Unauthorized reproduction or transmission of this material is strictly prohibited. Dimensional accepts no responsibility for loss arising from the use of the information contained herein.
This material is not directed at any person in any jurisdiction where the availability of this material is prohibited or would subject Dimensional or its products or services to any registration, licensing, or other such legal requirements within the jurisdiction.
RISKS
Investments involve risks. The investment return and principal value of an investment may fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original value. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee strategies will be successful.
During this series, we have learned that our own behavioral biases are often the greatest threat to our financial well-being.
It is worth revisiting some of the basics about the stock market, and debunk some common myths.
In the final alphabetical installment of our Behavorial Biases Series, let’s dive into sunk cost fallacy and tracking error regret.
A four-year college degree is expensive. While the numbers vary, the data on the topic is sobering.